Overhead View
When looking at the scenes and the way the camera was placed I don’t think the director broke any of those three rules. I will explains why he didn’t break any of those rules. With the 180 rule the director never crossed the 180 line that would be known as the line of action. When he had the camera in the first shot then he went to a close up in the next shot the director did not pass the line there for not breaking the rule. When Wall-e goes away from his home there is a shot of him from the back going away into a lot of buildings. But the line of 180 has moved or the line of action has moved so the camera could be placed in a different spot and the director was able to take that shot. Every time the 180-degree line moves the camera have all new angles it can shoot from. For the rule of thirds the director used these for some shots. Wall-e was always in on of the thirds zone forcing our attention on Wall-e. But when there is that wide shot Wall-e is in the center not really in the rule of thirds. I think that the director didn’t really want is to pay that close attention to Wall-e and instead notice all the things around him that are in the rule of thirds. To show how damaged and destroyed everything is, just to pull more attention to it and know that something isn’t right. That’s what I looked to the first time I watch the clip. When looking at the rule of 30 the director always cut at least 30 degrees or went 30 percent in the shots. One he but 30 degrees and when from a MS to a CU and then back to as MS. The director didn’t break any of these rules.
No comments:
Post a Comment